We didn’t cross the border, the border crossed us
What do you think about this then?
I’ve been thinking a lot about:
Border crossings, (as ever, it seems to be the only thing I do think about, there are so manyborders to be crossed and each one is a challenge to the sense of integrity and ethical action i hold so dear as i try to love ethically, work ethically (ie in ways that don’t subsume me to the demeaning trap of wage labour that has killed me off so many times before but the cat is spritely) consume ethically (an impossible task i know & the ethics of a self-organised production seem a more irresistible hanger to drape my second hand clothes over) and resist in a way that pleases my ethical bones.
Cross the borders of silence
The possibility of no borders
always excites me.
Cos you & I have seen some unbelievable things.
a tussle with immigration forms
a Hassle – my touseled head, a computer, a pen, lots of paper, trips to the lawyers
doing the opposite of what they say
playing it safe is no way to bring a loved one into the country.
Not to romanticise the taking of risks.
this is no time to lose one’s tousled head
which are for caressing.
but i digress, my tigress (with black nails)
for we are one in precarity
you, and I and my young Spanish friend who works in menswear departments and my angolan friend whose husband refused to fight a war, not a nation, but found himself without one, with not even the right to human rights, for these, if you follow Slavoj Zizek’s logic (which I don’t always, i resist the way he repeatedly posits the inversion of a situation as its truth, as if he is seeing what no-one else is seeing. the limits to this lacanian model of communication are stark. Truth, power, hierarchy, analyst, parent, boss, politicians, philosopher, man, car, petrol. can we resist the temptation of truth and just analyse how the utterances operate?). but if we follow zizek’s argument – and he is working out of Etienne Balibar who is in turn working from Hannah Arendt’s work on the condition of refugees … Man (and i don’t know where this leaves woman) is made by citizenship and not citizenship by man (Balibar).
The conception of human rights based upon the assumed existence of a human begin as such broke down at the very moment when those who professed to believe in it were for the first time confronted with people who had indeed lost all other qualities and specific relationships except that they were still human. (arendt)
So that when I have been stripped of my socio-political identity through war, displacement, economic neo-liberalism, terror and borders, all i am is human and then I am denied human rights and am taken to a detention centre outside London or Paris.
Andwhat is the link between this and the brutal transformations that have transformed labour relations as a result of a succesful capitalist response to the struggles of the 60s and 70s. I am a white, educated, european woman and I have no choice but to live as a marginal in this city of mine. Therein lies my freedom but it’s a rocky road and i don’t count my battery chickens too triumphantly because this blip of arts money won’t last. In fact, I’m neatly caught in a horrible paradox, this world is rich because the other world is poor and the fat trickles down.
The history of Capitalism has been a series of attempts to solve the problem of worker mobility .. indenture, slavery, coolie systems, contract workers, guest workers, innumerable forms of border control. Recent movements of throught and protest, despite being labelled as mobilising around themes of anti-globalisation, are precisely the opposite when elaborated into the area of border control. Free market ideology is a myth. If we are truly to globalise, then let’s do it properly and open up borders for EVERYONE, not draining anyone’s brain and not indulguing the rich in this selective protectionism which is killing half the planet.
etienne Balibar has also drawn attention to the new apartheid in Europe. He says that you can see it in every European city – you can see it in the conditions of territorial, social and economic segregation that most migrants live in.
Migrants’ everyday practices are attempts to open up the borders of citizenship, to win new spaces of freedom. It’s a constant struggle with daily rewards and hourly frustrations.
To claim and affirm the right to mobility against the reality of labour and existential precarity seems radical and life-affirming. As I was reading this, i looked up from the page and saw this,
“Now, when, where and how you work is entirely up to you” – an advert for a Microsoft windows mobile.
but the point is that the european migration regime is aimed not just at keeping refugees and migrants out of europe but in promoting a process of selective inclusion.
there’s always someone being relegated to a 2nd class citizen
and there’s always someone for whom the borders are shifted according to a hierarchy of preference based on sameness.
Basic demands of groups working in this area are:
Freedom of movement
The right to stay
a Europe-wide legalisation for all undocumented people living in Europe
The CLOSURE of all detention centres in Europe
the uncoupling of the residence permit from the labour contract.
www.noborder.org (against the global border)
www.nolager.org (against camps and detentions outside and inside EU)
http://www.labournet.net/antiracism/0509/brides1.html (Brides without borders)
